{"id":257,"date":"2021-10-02T20:16:53","date_gmt":"2021-10-02T20:16:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/?p=257"},"modified":"2022-02-11T12:04:48","modified_gmt":"2022-02-11T12:04:48","slug":"a-comparison-of-foreign-settlements-in-korea-busan-and-incheon","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/2021\/10\/a-comparison-of-foreign-settlements-in-korea-busan-and-incheon\/","title":{"rendered":"A Comparison of Foreign Settlements in Korea: Busan and Incheon"},"content":{"rendered":"

Busan is located on the south-east coast of Korea, a geographically attractive port and trading centre in close proximity to Japan. This post will aim to compare the Japanese settlement at Busan with the general foreign settlements in Incheon (the port servicing Seoul), and understand the complex relationships between the Korean and foreign populations in each area. Using primary sources taken from the <\/span>North China Herald, <\/span><\/i>among others,<\/span> this post will analyse the subtle exploitation of Koreans by the Japanese settlement residents in Busan, and why Japanese presence differed from the presence of other foreign residents.<\/span><\/p>\n

[Note on place names: Busan is often Romanised as both Fusan and Pusan. Incheon was formerly known as Jemulpo, often Romanised as Chemulpo.]<\/span><\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

The Japan Gazette extracts the following letter from the Choya Shimbun; it was sent to the latter paper by the Okura Trading Company in Fusan; Corea: The Japanese Settlement in Fusan is not very extensive, but it is almost entirely a business Settlement. The streets are divided into two, one is named Bentendori(<\/span>\u5f01\u5929<\/span>) and the other Honcho-dori (<\/span>\u672c\u753a<\/span>). Many godowns are built in a line on the shore side of the Settlement, and shops are built behind every godown. The Kanri-kencho, or local Japanese office, is situated in Honcho-dori, which is on a beautiful position, facing the harbour of Fusan. Fine pine forests are on the left and right sides. Foreign, home, and police affairs, are all transacted at the Kanrikencho, where, however, the officials have not any very great tax upon their time. Last spring the river in the Settlement was dredged and cleaned out, and the streets were also repaired by order of Kondo, Superintendent of the Japanese Police. A small hill lies on the coast, on which he wishes to make a garden for our residents, and the work has been commenced. Omura, a large village, lies at a distance of 30 Corean miles from the Japanese Settlement.<\/span><\/p>\n

North China Herald<\/span><\/i>, 28 July 1877. [emphasis added][1]<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Here, the Japanese settlement at Busan is explained as \u201centirely a business settlement\u201d. Following the Treaty of Kanghwa in 1876 (which brought the \u2018open-port period\u2019 in Korea) the Japanese Government sought to stabilize and expand its settlement in the port-city Busan, which has existed since approximately the 15<\/span>th<\/span> century. The source above, being written in the year following the treaty, depicts the geography of Busan and shows the early Japanese domination of the landscape, and the potential for expansion of this.<\/span><\/p>\n

As a result of several political mandates in favour of Japanese territoriality, the political centre of the town moved from Tongnae (where the Korean commercial market area was) to the growing area of the Waegwan (where the existing Japanese settlement and markets based within The Japan House were). Sungwoo Kang argues that<\/span> Japanese migration occurred more for commercial interests than political, as is shown by the popularity of Busan over Seoul as a migration destination prior to Korean annexation in 1910.[2] The fishing village of Incheon had been chosen as the corresponding open port for Seoul, despite its slight geographical unattractiveness. Due to the creation of foreign settlements around this village in the same manner as in Busan (but with other foreign powers present more so), it developed into a modern city port by the time of annexation.<\/span><\/p>\n

Because of the existing Japanese settlement in Busan at The Japan House, the town already sat at the centre of existing trading structures both domestically and internationally. With the opening of the ports after 1876, its central trading position was reinforced, and the trading structures greatly influenced by the expanding Japanese presence. By 1909, the Japanese population outnumbered the Korean population in the city. Thus, Busan became Japan\u2019s foothold in Korea for further imperial expansion.<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"\u00a0[3]<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

From the Korean perspective, the expansion of Japanese economic control in Busan is understood as a subtle exploitation of the Korean population. The Japanese expanded in Busan through various methods. Firstly, through the \u2018perpetual leasehold\u2019 of the area surrounding The Japan House. Kang states, \u201c<\/span>The right to lease (without compensation), donate, and dispose of land was given to the Japanese settlers<\/span><\/i>.\u201d[4] The assumed continual habitation of this area gave settlers a secure base from which to expand the spatial boundary of their activities. Japanese land transactions were permitted from 1880 onwards, and Japanese residents purchased areas of land which the Korean Government had deemed insignificant. However, this land, and the land within the Japanese settlement, was sold exclusively to other Japanese residents. Japanese forces also purchased or took over the land given to foreign consulates in Busan after they closed, with no compensations being given to the Korean Government (the original owners of the gifted land). Other foreign settlements in Busan were further dismantled. The exploitation narrative is rooted, therefore, in the clear power imbalance in these transactions in favour of the Japanese, and the dependency that the Korean population developed as the economic structures of Busan changed to fit Japanese interests.<\/span><\/p>\n

[Pusan] has not been in the least affected by [the Koreans]: it is still Japan. Nor have the Koreans, in their turn, been leavened by it. The natives of the neighborhood, impelled by the desire to trade, and more by the curiosity for foreign sights, visit it by day, but they return at night to their own town.<\/span><\/p>\n

(Lowell 1886, p. 36)[5]<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Kang mentions, however, that the Japanese did not seize land in Busan before it was legally allowed after annexation, and thus the expansion of the Japanese settlement was natural.[6] From the Japanese perspective, migration to Busan was encouraged by the Japanese Government as a means to solve many of its own domestic social issues, such as unemployment and rural impoverishment.[7] The surplus population in Japan could thus be controlled through migration to the Korean peninsula.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

The settlement at Incheon expanded differently to the settlement at Busan. At Incheon, a multitude of foreign powers entered the general settlement area (including China, Great Britain, Japan, U.S., and Germany). However, Japan entered into the settlement transaction through its ordinary consular function, rather than reaching a direct agreement with the Korean Government, as was the case in Busan.[8] The settlement at Incheon developed more pluralistically. The Korean Government, however, was often left out of this pluralism. Harold J. Noble claims that at Incheon, there was a dispute over how the Korean Government should reserve lots within the designated foreign settlement. The debate centred around whether the Korean Government reserved the right to make a land reservation at will or must apply for it in the same way as foreign renters through the municipal council. Noble states that, \u201c<\/span>The agreement of the [Korean] government to reserve no more lots [after the dispute] was a mark of its weakness and desire to compromise rather than of the legality of the contentions of the foreign representatives<\/span><\/i>.\u201d[9] Furthermore, at Busan there already existed a strong Japanese presence by 1876, and the trading structures could be easily moulded to benefit the Japanese residents and business owners there. Comparatively, at Incheon, the port city was built up around the foreign settlements and trading opportunities they created, and the city itself grew out of this. The two ports, although similar in treaty-port status, thus need to be understood differently due to their differing relationships with their Japanese residents.<\/span><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\n

[1]<\/span> Kang, Sungwoo, \u2018Colonising the Port City Pusan in Korea: A Study of the Process of Japanese Domination in the Urban Space of Pusan During the Open-Port Period (1876-1910)\u2019, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Oxford (2012) p. 35<\/span><\/p>\n

[2]<\/span> Ibid, p. 58<\/span><\/p>\n

[3]<\/span> Figure taken from Kang (2012), p. 58<\/span><\/p>\n

[4]<\/span> Ibid, p. 46<\/span><\/p>\n

[5]<\/span> Ibid,\u00a0 p. 43<\/span><\/p>\n

[6]<\/span> Ibid, p. 46<\/span><\/p>\n

[7]<\/span> Ibid, p. 68<\/span><\/p>\n

[8]<\/span> Noble, Harold J. \u201cThe Former Foreign Settlements in Korea.\u201d <\/span>The American Journal of International<\/span><\/i> Law<\/span><\/i> 23, No. 4 (October 1, 1929<\/span>):<\/b> p. 775<\/span><\/p>\n

[9]<\/span> Ibid, p. 768<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Busan is located on the south-east coast of Korea, a geographically attractive port and trading centre in close proximity to Japan. This post will aim to compare the Japanese settlement at Busan with the general foreign settlements in Incheon (the port servicing Seoul), and understand the complex relationships between the Korean and foreign populations in […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":16,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[31,32,34,30,33],"class_list":["post-257","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-korea","tag-busan","tag-incheon","tag-jemulpo","tag-korea","tag-treaty-port"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/16"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=257"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":263,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/257\/revisions\/263"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=257"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=257"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=257"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}