{"id":220,"date":"2021-09-19T10:30:59","date_gmt":"2021-09-19T10:30:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/?p=220"},"modified":"2022-02-11T12:04:49","modified_gmt":"2022-02-11T12:04:49","slug":"defining-national-identity-and-claiming-modernity-the-united-states-consulate-yokohama","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/2021\/09\/defining-national-identity-and-claiming-modernity-the-united-states-consulate-yokohama\/","title":{"rendered":"Defining National Identity and Claiming Modernity: The United States Consulate, Yokohama."},"content":{"rendered":"

\u00a0\"The \"United
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

The Ansei Treaties of 1858 ended Japan\u2019s national exclusion through the development of treaty ports such as Yokohama, involving the country in an international trade network dependent on foreign accommodations and concessions. It has been suggested that the treaty ports became a \u201cplace of intersection for modern imperialism\u201d. [1]<\/a> \u00a0This is evidenced in The Far East publication\u2019s article on the United States Consulate, which demonstrates a conflict between America\u2019s cultural assumptions of its Japanese hosts and the necessity for a productive coexistence.[2]<\/a><\/p>\n

The article places significance on the location and arrangement of the American Consulate buildings, implying that the physical landscape of the Treaty Ports acted as an authoritative stamp of foreign power, despite the lack of formal territorial possession. It states: \u201cThe building is directly opposite the Saibansho\u201d and lists the varying functions of the Consulate itself. The spatial proximity of the buildings creates an impression of American dominance, where the Consulate acted as the capital of success. Indeed, the presence of the Consul\u2019s private residence alongside national corporations, such as the US post office, implies that the infiltration of the US into Yokohama occurred on both a public and private level. Seemingly, traditional boundaries between administrative, commercial and domestic space were largely discarded in favour of the pervasion of a \u2018total\u2019 American identity. Social measures such as the importation of American food and the introduction of baseball were important accompaniments to this policy of cultural distinction from the Japanese.[3]<\/a><\/p>\n

Despite this, the ensuing discussion of commerce in Yokohama presents a conflict between the retention of an American national identity and the necessity for interaction with Japanese industry. The writer\u2019s commending tone toward American commercial success is heightened by the deliberate contrast with Japanese efforts of industrialisation. The writer suggests that the local community comprised of \u201cloafers\u201d, who were better off shipped across to America where they could experience the true meaning of modernity. This implies that American inhabitants of Yokohama subscribed to stereotypes that the Japanese were \u201cessentially feeble\u201d and that foreigners had a \u201cmoral imperative\u201d to improve the situation of this isolated outpost.[4]<\/a> Emphasis of \u201cincreased business\u201d as a result of the Pacific Mail Company steamers suggests that the treaty port of Yokohama fostered solely American ambitions which dragged Japan into an international modernity, both physically and psychologically.<\/p>\n

This description devalues The Far East\u2019s article as a measured assessment of industrial development in the 19th<\/sup> century. Instead, it suggests that the concept of \u2018modernity\u2019 which was fostered during this time was a Western mediated phenomenon, rather than a progression which occurred on Japanese soil. It is true that Japan\u2019s trade increased after foreign intervention- by the end of the twentieth century, Japan and China together supplied one third of the world\u2019s silk.[5]<\/a> \u00a0However, in contradiction, there was never one obsolete power in Yokohama. The intersection of West and East created a territorially ambiguous space where both powers met through commercial necessity. Cultural assumptions of Japanese inadequacy still prevailed but were reshaped and overridden by the necessity for interaction. Japan retained autonomy over the division of space in the port, where institutions were \u201clined up\u201d and jockeying for valuable access to the water.[6]<\/a> The derogatory description of the local community suggests that American survival depended on interactions with local Japanese as physical isolation was both impossible and detrimental. Imports from the West have been described as \u201cthe first step toward prosperity\u201d for new Meiji Imperialism. The state propagated an image of aspirational Japan who acted as a facilitator of international trade, inserting themselves into the narrative of modernity which the Far East implies was exclusively \u2018Western\u2019.[7]<\/a> Consequently, whilst the American presence was notable in Yokohama, it did not exist without interdependence on the locals, which stimulated a search for national identity on both parts. This made the treaty ports a unique setting, where national identities were forged and redefined in an environment of divergence.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

Bibliography<\/strong><\/p>\n

Primary Source<\/strong><\/p>\n

Anglin, James, \u201cThe United States Consulate\u201d, The Far East<\/em>, Vol.1, No.18, (Yokohama February 1871), pp.5-6.<\/p>\n

Secondary Sources<\/strong><\/p>\n

Ambaras, David, Japan\u2019s Imperial Underworlds: Intimate Encounters at the Borders of Empire,<\/em> (Cambridge 2018).<\/p>\n

Bytheway, J, \u201cThe Arrival of the Modern West in Yokohama: Images of the Japanese Experience 1859-1899\u201d, in Donna Brunero and Stephanie Villalta Puig, Life in Treaty Port China and Japan<\/em>, (Singapore 2018), pp.246-267.<\/p>\n

Hoare, James, The Japanese Treaty Ports 1868-1899: A Study of the Foreign Settlements,<\/em> (London 1970).<\/p>\n

Roden, Donald, \u201cBaseball and the Quest for National Dignity in Meiji Japan.\u201d\u00a0The American Historical Review<\/em>, vol. 85, no. 3, (Oxford 1980), pp. 511\u2013534.<\/p>\n

Taylor, Jeremy, \u201cThe Bund: Littoral Space of Empire in the Treaty Ports of East Asia\u201d, Social History<\/em>, Vol. 27, No.2, (2002), pp. 125-142.<\/p>\n

Xu, Yingnan, “Industrialization and the Chinese Hand-Reeled Silk Industry (1880-1930)”, Penn History Review,<\/em> Vol. 19, No.1, (Pennsylvania 2012), pp.27-46.<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

[1]<\/a> David Ambaras, Japan\u2019s Imperial Underworlds: Intimate Encounters at the Borders of Empire,<\/em> (Cambridge 2018), p.71.<\/p>\n

[2]<\/a> James Anglin, \u201cThe United States Consulate\u201d, The Far East<\/em>, Vol.1, No.18, (Yokohama February 1871), pp.5-6.<\/p>\n

[3]<\/a> James Hoare, The Japanese Treaty Ports 1868-1899: A Study of the Foreign Settlements,<\/em> (London 1970), p.111. Donald Roden, \u201cBaseball and the Quest for National Dignity in Meiji Japan\u201d,\u00a0The American Historical Review,<\/em> vol. 85, no. 3, (Oxford 1980), p.512.<\/p>\n

[4]<\/a> Roden, \u201cBaseball and the Quest for National Dignity\u201d, p.152.<\/p>\n

[5]<\/a> Yingnan Xu, “Industrialization and the Chinese Hand-Reeled Silk Industry (1880-1930)”, Penn History Review,<\/em> Vol. 19, No.1, (Pennsylvania 2012), p.31.<\/p>\n

[6]<\/a> Jeremy Taylor, \u201cThe Bund: Littoral Space of Empire in the Treaty Ports of East Asia\u201d, Social History<\/em>, Vol. 27, No.2, (2002), p.134.<\/p>\n

[7]<\/a> J. Bytheway, \u201cThe Arrival of the Modern West in Yokohama: Images of the Japanese Experience 1859-1899\u201d, in Donna Brunero and Stephanie Villalta Puig, Life in Treaty Port China and Japan<\/em>, (Singapore 2018), p.256.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

\u00a0 The Ansei Treaties of 1858 ended Japan\u2019s national exclusion through the development of treaty ports such as Yokohama, involving the country in an international trade network dependent on foreign accommodations and concessions. It has been suggested that the treaty ports became a \u201cplace of intersection for modern imperialism\u201d. [1] \u00a0This is evidenced in The […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":10,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[17,21,25,23,22,24,18,20,19],"class_list":["post-220","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-19th-century-japan","tag-buildings","tag-identity","tag-industrialisation","tag-modernity","tag-nationality","tag-treaty-ports","tag-united-states","tag-yokohama"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/10"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=220"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":235,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/220\/revisions\/235"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=220"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=220"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=220"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}