{"id":1730,"date":"2024-01-30T12:31:32","date_gmt":"2024-01-30T12:31:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/?p=1730"},"modified":"2024-01-30T12:31:32","modified_gmt":"2024-01-30T12:31:32","slug":"five-pavilions-in-jingshan-park-beijing-the-absence-of-special-items-forges-the-national-sentiment-and-shapes-collective-historical-memory","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/2024\/01\/five-pavilions-in-jingshan-park-beijing-the-absence-of-special-items-forges-the-national-sentiment-and-shapes-collective-historical-memory\/","title":{"rendered":"Five pavilions in Jingshan Park, Beijing: The absence of special items forges the national sentiment and shapes collective historical memory"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Jingshan Park in Beijing is located next to the Forbidden city. (Figure 1) For many years, this park has been imperial and not opened to the public until 1928. Like many other imperial places, the park was invaded and destroyed when foreign troops entered Beijing in the late imperial period. This blog will refer to a tour guide article published in 2012 on a local Chinese tourism website, to discuss the impact of historical traumas on the park\u2019s architecture, asserting that despite the foreign invasion caused severe architectural destruction, a deliberate decision by the government for not restoring some Buddha statues within the traditional pavilions in Jingshan Park can further cultivate national sentiment. By selectively choosing which historical aspects to restore, the government intends to shape collective memory and crafting a shared narrative that resonates with the broader populace.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1732\" src=\"http:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture-1-300x280.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"280\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture-1-300x280.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture-1.jpg 537w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/>Figure 1. Map of Jingshan Park and the Forbidden city<\/p>\n<p>According to the website\u2019s article, Jingshan Park has five traditional pavilions, each housing a copper Buddha statue representing one of the five tastes: sour, bitter, sweet, acrid, and salt.<sup><a href=\"#footnote_1_1730\" id=\"identifier_1_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-identifier-link\" title=\"&lsquo;Jingshan Park&rsquo;, Travel China Guide, March 2012, &lt;https:\/\/www.travelchinaguide.com\/attraction\/beijing\/jingshan.htm&gt; [accessed 29 January 2024].\">1<\/a><\/sup> Regrettably, during the siege of the international legations in 1900, foreign soldiers removed four of these statues,<sup><a href=\"#footnote_2_1730\" id=\"identifier_2_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-identifier-link\" title=\"&lsquo;Jingshan Park&rsquo;.\">2<\/a><\/sup> directly compromising the integrity of the five tastes. There was only one statue in Wanchun Pavilion (Figure 2.) being preserved.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1733\" style=\"font-family: inherit;font-style: inherit;font-weight: inherit\" src=\"http:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture-2-300x178.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"178\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture-2-300x178.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture-2.jpg 414w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><span style=\"font-size: 14px\">Figure 2. Wanchun Pavillion<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Although this statue was preserved during the 1900 event, it was completely destroyed during the Cultural Revolution in the 1960s when fervent individuals destroyed all Buddhist-related objects within the park.<sup><a href=\"#footnote_3_1730\" id=\"identifier_3_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-identifier-link\" title=\"&ldquo;Jingshan Gongyuan de Wuzuotingzi&rdquo; \u666f\u5c71\u516c\u56ed\u7684\u4e94\u5ea7\u4ead\u5b50, Beijingshi Reming Zhengfu \u5317\u4eac\u5e02\u4eba\u6c11\u653f\u5e9c(2017), https:\/\/www.beijing.gov.cn\/renwen\/jrbj\/sjc\/201703\/t20170309_1874497.html.\">3<\/a><\/sup> The removal of the first four statues symbolises the traumatic loss of Chinese traditional treasures due to Western powers, while the destruction of the second one mirrors the upheaval within Chinese society during the Cultural Revolution. Notably, the government\u2019s response to these losses diverges. The Buddha statue, destroyed during the Cultural Revolution, was restored in 1998, signifying a commitment to reclaiming historical heritage. However, a proposal by Li Yuling in 2006 to restore the remaining four statues was rejected during the conference.<sup><a href=\"#footnote_4_1730\" id=\"identifier_4_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-identifier-link\" title=\"&ldquo;Luoshi Huifu Jingshan Wuting Lishiyuanmao Zhengxietian Jiaoliuhui Zaijingjuxing&rdquo; \u843d\u5b9e\u6062\u590d\u666f\u5c71\u4e94\u4ead\u5386\u53f2\u539f\u8c8c\u653f\u534f\u63d0\u6848\u4ea4\u6d41\u4f1a\u5728\u4eac\u4e3e\u884c, Fojiao Zaxian (2006), https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20140106033017\/http:\/\/news.fjnet.com\/jjdt\/jjdtnr\/200605\/t20060524_26414.htm.\">4<\/a><\/sup> This discrepancy in handling restoration projects reflects the government\u2019s selective emphasis on historical narratives. Likely, the website does not mention the destruction of the statue in Wanchun Pavilion during the Cultural Revolution, underscoring the nuanced ways historical narratives are presented.<\/p>\n<p>The historical narratives surrounding Jingshan Park reveal a discernible selectivity on the website, omitting certain facts and focusing on specific aspects. The absence of the four statues connected to the foreign invasion serves as a poignant reminder of a national tragedy inflicted by the West. Their non-restoration perpetuates a historical memory of loss, casting a shadow that lingers with visitors. The enduring pain of losing these traditional artifacts persists, leaving an impact on those who visit the remaining four pavilions. In contrast, the statue in Wanchun Pavilion, tied to internal chaos, underwent restoration in 1998. This act of restoration seeks to efface the traces of its destruction and erase the memory of violent actions carried out by the Chinese themselves. These selective restoration projects reflect the government\u2019s effort to reshape historical narratives selectively. It brings to mind Zheng Wang\u2019s book, <em>Never Forget National Humiliation<\/em>, where he introduces a concept of the Choseness-Myths-Trauma complex. He suggests that the government strategically select certain historical events to construct a chosen historical memory, invoking national sentiment.<sup><a href=\"#footnote_5_1730\" id=\"identifier_5_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-identifier-link\" title=\"Zheng Wang, Never Forget National Humiliation: Historical Memory in Chinese Politics and Foreign Relations (New York, 2014), p. 39.\">5<\/a><\/sup> The revived statue in Wanchun Pavilion, distinct from the four forever-lost statues from the foreign occupation, symbolises the enduring Chinese tradition and spirit despite the challenges posed by Western invasion. It stands as a carefully chosen memorial object, contributing to the construction of a resilient national identity.<\/p>\n<p>In this week\u2019s elective reading on Taiwan park, the author highlights the replacement of Kodama Gentaro and Goto Shinpei\u2019s statues with those of Sun Yat-sen and Chiang Kai-shek, claiming it demonstrates another type of \u2018colonial\u2019 occupation and changing political landscapes.<sup><a href=\"#footnote_6_1730\" id=\"identifier_6_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-identifier-link\" title=\"Joseph R. Allen, &lsquo;Taipei Park: Signs of Occupation&rsquo;, The Journal of Asian Studies 66: 1 (2007), p. 177, &lt;https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0021911807000010&gt; [accessed 29 January 2024].\">6<\/a><\/sup> This blog asserts that beyond the visual impact of statues, the absence of traditional objects in specific spaces can significantly contribute to shaping national sentiment and moulding selective historical memory. It posits that not only do specific historical events construct national sentiment, but the simultaneous presence and absence of exhibit items in historical spaces can also influence historical interpretations, directing the emphasis on sentiment and memory.<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1734\" src=\"http:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture-3-225x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"225\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture-3-225x300.jpg 225w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture-3.jpg 250w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px\" \/>Figure 3. The restored Buddha statue in Wanchun Pavilion<\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1731\" src=\"http:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture--300x226.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"226\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture--300x226.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/01\/Picture-.jpg 528w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/>Figure 4. Russian Occupation of Jingshan Park, 1900<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Bibliography<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Primary Sources<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>\u2018Jingshan Park\u2019, <em>Travel China Guide<\/em>, March 2012, &lt; https:\/\/www.travelchinaguide.com\/attraction\/beijing\/jingshan.htm&gt; [accessed 29 January 2024].<\/p>\n<p><strong><u>Secondary Sources<\/u><\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Allen, Joseph R, \u2018Taipei Park: Signs of Occupation\u2019, <em>The Journal of Asian Studies<\/em> 66: 1 (2007), pp. 159\u2013199, &lt;https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0021911807000010&gt; [accessed 29 January 2024].<\/p>\n<p>\u201cJingshan Gongyuan de Wuzuo Tingzi\u201d \u666f\u5c71\u516c\u56ed\u7684\u4e94\u5ea7\u4ead\u5b50, Beijingshi Renming Zhengfu \u5317\u4eac\u5e02\u4eba\u6c11\u653f\u5e9c(2017), https:\/\/www.beijing.gov.cn\/renwen\/jrbj\/sjc\/201703\/t20170309_1874497.html.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cLuoshi Huifu Jingshan Wuting Lishiyuanmao Zhengxietian Jiaoliuhui Zaijingjuxing\u201d \u843d\u5b9e\u6062\u590d\u666f\u5c71\u4e94\u4ead\u5386\u53f2\u539f\u8c8c\u653f\u534f\u63d0\u6848\u4ea4\u6d41\u4f1a\u5728\u4eac\u4e3e\u884c, Fojiao Zaxian (2006), <a href=\"https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20140106033017\/http:\/news.fjnet.com\/jjdt\/jjdtnr\/200605\/t20060524_26414.htm\">https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20140106033017\/http:\/\/news.fjnet.com\/jjdt\/jjdtnr\/200605\/t20060524_26414.htm<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Wang, Zheng, <em>Never forget national humiliation: Historical memory in Chinese politics and foreign relations<\/em> (New York, 2014).<\/p>\n<ol class=\"footnotes\"><li id=\"footnote_1_1730\" class=\"footnote\">\u2018Jingshan Park\u2019, <em>Travel China Guide<\/em>, March 2012, &lt;https:\/\/www.travelchinaguide.com\/attraction\/beijing\/jingshan.htm&gt; [accessed 29 January 2024].<span class=\"footnote-back-link-wrapper\"> [<a href=\"#identifier_1_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-back-link\">&#8617;<\/a>]<\/span><\/li><li id=\"footnote_2_1730\" class=\"footnote\">\u2018Jingshan Park\u2019.<span class=\"footnote-back-link-wrapper\"> [<a href=\"#identifier_2_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-back-link\">&#8617;<\/a>]<\/span><\/li><li id=\"footnote_3_1730\" class=\"footnote\">\u201cJingshan Gongyuan de Wuzuotingzi\u201d \u666f\u5c71\u516c\u56ed\u7684\u4e94\u5ea7\u4ead\u5b50, Beijingshi Reming Zhengfu \u5317\u4eac\u5e02\u4eba\u6c11\u653f\u5e9c(2017), https:\/\/www.beijing.gov.cn\/renwen\/jrbj\/sjc\/201703\/t20170309_1874497.html.<span class=\"footnote-back-link-wrapper\"> [<a href=\"#identifier_3_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-back-link\">&#8617;<\/a>]<\/span><\/li><li id=\"footnote_4_1730\" class=\"footnote\">\u201cLuoshi Huifu Jingshan Wuting Lishiyuanmao Zhengxietian Jiaoliuhui Zaijingjuxing\u201d \u843d\u5b9e\u6062\u590d\u666f\u5c71\u4e94\u4ead\u5386\u53f2\u539f\u8c8c\u653f\u534f\u63d0\u6848\u4ea4\u6d41\u4f1a\u5728\u4eac\u4e3e\u884c, Fojiao Zaxian (2006), https:\/\/web.archive.org\/web\/20140106033017\/http:\/\/news.fjnet.com\/jjdt\/jjdtnr\/200605\/t20060524_26414.htm.<span class=\"footnote-back-link-wrapper\"> [<a href=\"#identifier_4_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-back-link\">&#8617;<\/a>]<\/span><\/li><li id=\"footnote_5_1730\" class=\"footnote\">Zheng Wang, Never <em>Forget National Humiliation: Historical Memory in Chinese Politics and Foreign Relations<\/em> (New York, 2014), p. 39.<span class=\"footnote-back-link-wrapper\"> [<a href=\"#identifier_5_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-back-link\">&#8617;<\/a>]<\/span><\/li><li id=\"footnote_6_1730\" class=\"footnote\">Joseph R. Allen, \u2018Taipei Park: Signs of Occupation\u2019, <em>The Journal of Asian Studies<\/em> 66: 1 (2007), p. 177, &lt;https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1017\/s0021911807000010&gt; [accessed 29 January 2024].<span class=\"footnote-back-link-wrapper\"> [<a href=\"#identifier_6_1730\" class=\"footnote-link footnote-back-link\">&#8617;<\/a>]<\/span><\/li><\/ol>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Jingshan Park in Beijing is located next to the Forbidden city. (Figure 1) For many years, this park has been imperial and not opened to the public until 1928. Like many other imperial places, the park was invaded and destroyed when foreign troops entered Beijing in the late imperial period. This blog will refer to [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":32,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1730","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1730","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/32"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1730"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1730\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1735,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1730\/revisions\/1735"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1730"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1730"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1730"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}