{"id":170,"date":"2020-04-21T06:43:58","date_gmt":"2020-04-21T06:43:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/?p=170"},"modified":"2022-02-11T12:05:03","modified_gmt":"2022-02-11T12:05:03","slug":"shanghai-homes-as-private-domestic-spaces","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/2020\/04\/shanghai-homes-as-private-domestic-spaces\/","title":{"rendered":"Shanghai Homes as Private Domestic Spaces"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Following the end of the Opium War, the Treaty of Nanking in 1842 symbolised the opening of treaty ports. Shanghai\u2019s opening welcomed an influx in \u00a0Western traders as well as foreign settlers. The influence of such foreign settlers was apparent across broad swathes of the Chinese community. Such influence was clearly recognisable through the development of architecture in Shanghai. Such an exchange between western modernity and traditional Chinese emerged within Shanghai\u2019s neighbourhoods, in particularly Shanghai\u2019s <em>lilong <\/em>residences.<a href=\"#_ftn1\" name=\"_ftnref1\">[1]<\/a>The rise in <em>Shikumen<\/em> style housing, which made up a significant proportion of lilong residences, by 1930, serve as insightful spaces of historical artefact, in which Jie Li, has examined thoroughly within her work on <em>Shanghai Homes: Palimpsests of Private Life <\/em>(2015). Through maintaining an interdisciplinary approach to the comparison of two <em>shikumen<\/em> style houses, in which both Jie Li\u2019s paternal and maternal grandparents and family subsequently lived from 1930, through the combination of ethnography and microhistory Li creates her own approach to the subject of such housing in Shanghai as palimpsests, through her approach \u201cExcavate Where I Stand.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn2\" name=\"_ftnref2\">[2]<\/a> Thus through the analysis of the private and domestic space, witnessed with Jie Li\u2019s work the author reclaims the importance of such domestic spaces, and reclaims the space of Shanghai alleyways in history as \u201cShanghai alleyways.. a palimpsests of voices and noises, past and present.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn3\" name=\"_ftnref3\">[3]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Despite critiques of microhistory, which focus on its limited scope, the strength here within Li\u2019s work shows the role of microhistory as facilitating the \u2018excavation\u2019 of details, within the private domestic space, which overall serve to contribute to the readers understanding on the topic of enquiry as a whole. By expressing that whilst \u201ca microhistory is not the last nail on the coffin of its subject matter, but rather an invitation to examine similarly obscured lives and to open up the Pandora\u2019s box of a past era.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn4\" name=\"_ftnref4\">[4]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Moreover, the approach through its focus on ethnology additionally succeeds in transforming the role of local gossip into a tool, for the use of the historian. As \u201cthe private narratives of the past form gossip and family lore.. an undercurrent of private interests, voices and beliefs.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn5\" name=\"_ftnref5\">[5]<\/a> Thus, through this approach historians are able to gain access to otherwise lost oral narratives of a private closed spaces. Which may be viewed as particularly crucial in the case of reconstructing narratives of the private space within Shanghai alleyway homes throughout the early twentieth century. This is summarised accordingly by Li as, \u201cthe history of any alleyway should be written as an anthology of gossip exchanged among its residents.\u201d<a href=\"#_ftn6\" name=\"_ftnref6\">[6]<\/a><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The importance of the private domestic space in this instance of understanding Shanghai Homes within the period, is reclaimed through the deployment of Li\u2019s ethnographical and micro historical approach, which succeeds in light of sceptics views of microhistory. Let us hope that Jie Li\u2019s insightful approach may be adopted as an alternative approach to examining otherwise unavailable private domestic spaces by historians in the future.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><u>Bibliography <\/u><\/p>\n<p>Li, Jie, <em>Shanghai Homes: Palimpsests of Private Life<\/em>. (New York:, 2015).<\/p>\n<p>Yang Xianoneng, \u2018Shanghai Alleyways: Situating Jinahua Gong\u2019s Shanghai Alleyways\u2019, Cross-Currents East Asian History and Culture Review, Volume No.2, March 2010.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref1\" name=\"_ftn1\">[1]<\/a> <em>Lilong<\/em>, is a term used to describe a street, sometimes interconnected where <em>Shikumen<\/em> housing would be found.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref2\" name=\"_ftn2\">[2]<\/a> Jie Li, <em>Shanghai Homes: Palimpsests of Private Lives<\/em>, (New York, 2015) p.11.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref3\" name=\"_ftn3\">[3]<\/a> <em>Ibid<\/em>.,p.12.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref4\" name=\"_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> <em>Ibid<\/em>.,p.14.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref5\" name=\"_ftn5\">[5]<\/a> <em>Ibid.,<\/em>p.23.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"#_ftnref6\" name=\"_ftn6\">[6]<\/a> <em>Ibid., p.142<\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Following the end of the Opium War, the Treaty of Nanking in 1842 symbolised the opening of treaty ports. Shanghai\u2019s opening welcomed an influx in \u00a0Western traders as well as foreign settlers. The influence of such foreign settlers was apparent across broad swathes of the Chinese community. Such influence was clearly recognisable through the development [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-170","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=170"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":171,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/170\/revisions\/171"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=170"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=170"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=170"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}