{"id":1324,"date":"2023-10-20T20:10:37","date_gmt":"2023-10-20T20:10:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/?p=1324"},"modified":"2023-10-20T20:10:37","modified_gmt":"2023-10-20T20:10:37","slug":"exhibiting-modernity-and-colonisation-what-yoshida-hatsusaburos-map-of-the-1935-taiwan-exhibition-indicates-about-taiwan-and-japanese-imperialism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/2023\/10\/exhibiting-modernity-and-colonisation-what-yoshida-hatsusaburos-map-of-the-1935-taiwan-exhibition-indicates-about-taiwan-and-japanese-imperialism\/","title":{"rendered":"Exhibiting Modernity and Colonisation: What Yoshida Hatsusaburo\u2019s map of the 1935 Taiwan Exhibition indicates about Taiwan and Japanese Imperialism."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0<\/span> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-1325 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/taiwan-expo-300x210.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"321\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/taiwan-expo-300x210.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/taiwan-expo.jpg 596w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 321px) 100vw, 321px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>Fig 1. &#8216;The 1935 Taiwan Exposition: In Commemoration of the First 40 Years of Colonial Rule&#8217;, Source: <\/strong><strong>&#8216;Special Exhibition: Back in their times: a visual history of Taiwan from the 1930s to the 1960s&#8217;,\u00a0 <em>The 228 Memorial Foundation<\/em>, accessed 9th of October 2023, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.228.org.tw\/en_exhibition-view.php?ID=14&amp;fbclid=IwAR3sq4Cvs-Kc_uTzOqLcL0sysF4jklRmumOAwiWFW41Q-rHxVJtpFoGSUAc\">Special Exhibition\uff5cBack in their times: a visual history of Taiwan from the 1930s to the 1960s\uff5cMemorial Foundation of 228\uff0eNational 228 Memorial Museum<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">This map by famed aerial artist Hatsusabur\u014d Yoshida of &#8216;The 1935 Taiwan Exposition: In Commemoration of the First 40 Years of Colonial Rule&#8217; is representative of Japan\u2019s desire to project their ideas of utopian modernism to the rest of the world and to mainland Japan. Their rational of modernising to protect themselves from, and surpass western empires is somewhat undercut by the fact that their concept of the modern were inherently modelled, at least spatially speaking, from said international influences.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">The map itself is keeping with a trend of colonial mapmaking that emerged in the 1930s which combines Japanese pictorialism with new photographic technology, specifically aerial photos. This genre of maps have been classified as Ch\u014dkanzu and were notable for their bird\u2019s eye view perspective, 3 dimensional representation, colourful design and most importantly, picturesque quality (1). Looking at maps with this style it becomes quickly apparent that the intended audience for the map was not the urban planner, engineer or government official but the tourist.\u00a0 As Allen asserts, it gives the localities it depicts a \u2018postcard destination\u2019 quality (2).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Below is another example of Taipei represented in this style on the eve of the 1935 Taiwan Exposition.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0<\/span> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\" wp-image-1326 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/greater-taipei-map-300x193.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"368\" height=\"237\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/greater-taipei-map-300x193.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/greater-taipei-map-1024x660.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/greater-taipei-map-768x495.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/greater-taipei-map.jpg 1211w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 368px) 100vw, 368px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>\u00a0Fig 2. \u2018Bird\u2019s Eye Map of Greater Taipei\u2019,\u00a0 Source: Keoni Everington, &#8221;Colorful &#8216;Bird&#8217;s Eye View of Taipei&#8221; Japanese map circa 1935,\u00a0 Taiwan News, (13th of January, 2017), <a href=\"https:\/\/www.taiwannews.com.tw\/en\/news\/3069242\">Colorful &#8216;Bird&#8217;s Eye View of Taipei&#8221; Japanese map circa 1935 | Taiwan News | 2017-01-13 18:30:00<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Between them there are distinctive similarities: the detailed architecture, the scroll labelling and iconography of both transport and industry, and of leisurely parks and nature. They both simultaneously portray an image of a cosmopolitan and prosperous nation, and a luxurious and leisurely travel destination. They exist as publicly accessible texts that visualise the city in modern and idealistic terms. While they exist as Japanese colonial propaganda, they do so in different ways. The \u2018Bird\u2019s Eye Map of Greater Taipei\u2019 on its own encapsulates Japanese colonial ideology by its foregrounding of Japanese settlements over Chinese areas, and the fictious geographic placing over the water of Japan\u2019s iconic Mount Fuji and other colonies \u2013 Korea and Manchukuo. As Allen asserts, this representation is one of possession and desire (3).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">While this map can be seen as product of colonial ideology, the 1935 Exposition Map is reliant on the context of the Exposition and the general phenomenon of world exhibitions. As such this map can be seen as a sub product of the propaganda that was the 1935 Taiwan Exposition.\u00a0 Following the 1851 Great Exhibition in London, world exhibitions took on its model of showcasing industry, architecture, and technology, mixing private, public and governmental institutions for a tourist and consumer audience. Japan was one of the nations, and the first non-western empire, to be inspired by this model. It held several exhibitions in Osaka and Tokyo between 1877 and 1911. It soon also held exhibitions in its colonial territories, including one in Taipei in 1916, however the later exposition in 1935 was considered the greatest of all the colonial exhibitions. This was at least partially a consequence of the significance of the event, the celebration of the 40<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">th<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0anniversary of Japanese rule in Taiwan. The island was important symbolically to Japan as its first colony; if any part of its empire was going to demonstrate the power of Japanese imperialism to the rest of the world, it was Taiwan. As\u00a0<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Got\u014d Shinpei<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0declared, Taiwan was the \u2018colonization university\u2019 and the first \u2018to demonstrate that Japan was the equal of Western Imperialists\u2019 (4). As Young asserts, this desire to\u00a0modernise\u00a0and compete with western nations drove much of the architecture building in later colonial projects like the Manchurian cities (5).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">In order to celebrate its power, the exposition was structured over 3 main sites, two in Taipei and one in Da-Dao-Cheng. The first site\u00a0centred\u00a0around\u00a0<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Taihoku City Public Auditorium (now Zhongshan Hall) and was populated with: pavilions showcasing Taiwanese industries, the Hall of Encouraging New Trade and the Hall of Prefectural Affairs which highlighted other Japanese colonies like Manchuria and Korea. The second took place in Taihoku New Park (now 228 Peace Memorial Park) focused on more social and cultural transformations in Taiwan, with an open air theatre, a cinema house, the musical hall and the First Cultural Hall, previously the Taiwan museum, which discussed the process of educated modernisation. The third site largely focused on tourism and recreational activities in Taiwan (6). Through this arrangement visitors were able to experience several dichotomies: present and future, production and consumption, governmental and private, citizen and tourist, Western and Asian, colony and colonial state.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Returning to the representation of this event in the\u00a0<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Ch\u014dkanzu\u00a0map, it depicts the two main sites of the Exposition. For the sake of unity and practicality, it distorts these two sites to be spatially connected.\u00a0 While close in distance, the google maps show that it skips over two blocks worth of space.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0<\/span> <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-1327 aligncenter\" src=\"http:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/expo-sites-google-maps-300x222.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"222\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/expo-sites-google-maps-300x222.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/expo-sites-google-maps-1024x758.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/expo-sites-google-maps-768x568.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/expo-sites-google-maps.jpg 1518w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\">Fig 3.\u00a0 Satellite Map of the two Exposition sites.<span data-contrast=\"auto\">\u00a0Left side <\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Taihoku City Public Auditorium (Zhongshan Hall) and site one, right star aihoku New Park (now 228 Peace Memorial Park). Source: Google Maps<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">This erasure of urban space is also visibly seen is the map as well, as blocks of buildings are represented as grey, formless masses. While this could have been designed to highlight relevant buildings to exposition, it does partly function to make this urban image cleaner and more spacious. This is certainly the case with the roads, which are enlarged significantly in the map. In general, wider streets and more parks were two primary goals in housing and urban reform that planners were seeking in Japan (7). This is why the decision to place an Exposition site in a park, and the exaggerated representation of nature in the map , is significant as the green spaces in colonial cities were often far greater than what the average mainland Japanese urban dweller saw. Therefore, while the Expositions were trying to make an international statement, they were also trying to indicate to Japanese that the colonies were places that could achieve the reform and progress that was thus far unachievable on the mainland.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Finally, what\u2019s important to note about this map is the architectural design visible in the Exposition buildings. While there is a mix of styles present across the map, the influence of European design is clear, specifically in two key sites of the Exposition: The\u00a0<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Taihoku City Public Auditorium and the Taiwan Museum.\u00a0 Moreover, Ping-Sheng Wu and Min-Fu Hsu assert that many of the pavilions were in the art deco style (see below), a style that some Japanese architects in Manchuria thought they should use to reflect modern trends (8).<\/span><\/p>\n<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1329\" src=\"http:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5319-300x237.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"237\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5319-300x237.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5319-1024x810.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5319-768x608.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5319-1536x1215.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5319.jpg 1997w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/>\u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 <img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignnone size-medium wp-image-1328\" src=\"http:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5320-300x210.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"210\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5320-300x210.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5320-1024x716.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5320-768x537.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5320-1536x1074.jpg 1536w, https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/10\/IMG_5320.jpg 1970w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: center\"><strong>\u00a0Fig 4. (Left) The Hall of Sugar Industry.\u00a0 Fig 5. (right) The Main Gate of the First. Source: Ping-Sheng Wu, and Min-Fu Hsu. &#8220;Phantasmagoric Venues from the West to the East: Studies on the Great Exhibition (1851) and the Taiwan Exhibition (1935).&#8221; <i>Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering,<\/i> 5;2, (2006), pp.237-244, p.242<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">While their goal was to make a statement to the international community about Asian design, ultimately Bill Sewell argued that the Japanese were generally more concerned about joining European aesthetics, than overhauling them (9). Thus, any attempt by the Japanese to prove their superiority over the West was naturally undercut by the fact they were often working within Western concepts of modernist. What\u2019s more ironic about the development of the New Asian style in the 1930s was that much of the international \u2018modern\u2019 designs they were modelling from, were seen as increasingly irrelevant by the rest of the world.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">While most of the blog post has discussed what this map tells us about Japanese Imperialism and their concept of the modern, it hasn\u2019t yet discussed what this representation meant to the Taiwanese. This map was found amongst an online photo exhibit entitled: \u2018<\/span><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Back in their times: a visual history of Taiwan from the 1930s to the 1960s\u2019 on a website called the Memorial Foundation of 228 (10). The page states its last update was from 2021. What\u2019s striking is that, despite the 20 year difference the description that Allen gives of the 1999 exhibition \u2018Old Maps of Taipei and the 2004 exhibition \u2018Viewing Taipei\u2019, matches this website too &#8211;\u00a0 namely that they overwhelmingly positively focus on Japanese colonial historical contributions and downplay and ridicule Chinese nationalist attempts. While attempts to appear modern to an international audience may have been slightly undercut, to the Taiwanese people at least they have cemented a place as authors of modernity and development.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span data-contrast=\"auto\">Overall, as a historical document this map represents the ideals and contradictions of Japanese modernist propaganda, particularly in its presentation to mainland Japan and the rest of the world.\u00a0 However, as an item in a Taiwanese historical collection, it raises questions about how Taiwanese view the Japanese colonial period, and what<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>(1) Joseph R. Allen,\u00a0 <em>Taipei: City of Displacements<\/em>, (University of Washington Press, 2012), p.37<\/p>\n<p>(2) Allen, &#8216;<em>Taipei: City of Displacements<\/em>, p.37<\/p>\n<p>(3) Ibid, p.38<\/p>\n<p>(4) Ping-Sheng Wu, and Min-Fu Hsu. &#8220;Phantasmagoric Venues from the West to the East: Studies on the Great Exhibition (1851) and the Taiwan Exhibition (1935).&#8221; <i>Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering,<\/i> 5;2, (2006), pp.237-244, p.241<\/p>\n<p>(5) Louise Young, Japan\u2019s Total Empire: Manchuria and the Culture of Wartime Imperialism, Twentieth-Century Japan (Berkeley, Calif: University of California Press, 1999), pp.241-268.<\/p>\n<p>(6) Wu, Hsu, &#8220;Phantasmagoric Venues&#8217;, p. 242<\/p>\n<p>(7) <span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Tucker, David \u201cCity Planning Without Cities: Order and Chaos in Utopian Manchukuo\u201d in Mariko Asano Tamanoi ed., <em>Crossed Histories: Manchuria in the Age of Empire<\/em>,\u00a0 (University of Hawaii Press, 2005.), pp.53-81, p.57<\/span><\/p>\n<p>(8) Wu, Hsu, &#8220;Phantasmagoric Venues&#8217;, p. 242, and Sewell, Bill.\u00a0<i>Constructing Empire: The Japanese in Changchun, 1905\u201345<\/i>. (UBC Press, 2019.), p. 69-71<\/p>\n<p>(9) Sewell, &#8216;Constructing Empire&#8217;, p.71<\/p>\n<p>(10) &#8216;<span style=\"font-weight: 400\">Special Exhibition: Back in their times: a visual history of Taiwan from the 1930s to the 1960s&#8217;,\u00a0 <em>The 228 Memorial Foundation<\/em>, accessed 9th of October 2023<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; \u00a0 Fig 1. &#8216;The 1935 Taiwan Exposition: In Commemoration of the First 40 Years of Colonial Rule&#8217;, Source: &#8216;Special Exhibition: Back in their times: a visual history of Taiwan from the 1930s to the 1960s&#8217;,\u00a0 The 228 Memorial Foundation, accessed 9th of October 2023, Special Exhibition\uff5cBack in their times: a visual history of Taiwan [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":28,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1324","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1324","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/28"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1324"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1324\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1336,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1324\/revisions\/1336"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1324"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1324"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.spatialhistory.net\/cities\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1324"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}